Whether Karunanidhi accept that Dravidan [Ravana] can abduct others wife?
இராம, இராவண யுத்தம் ஆரிய, திராவிடப் போர் என்றால், திராவிடன் மற்றவன் மனைவியைக் கடத்தலாமா?
The Supreme Court asked the Centre to make its stand clear on the issue of whether Ram Sethu can be declared a national monument. It also directed the government to place on record within six weeks RK Pachauri committee's report on the feasibility of an alternative alignment for the 2,427-crore Sethusamudram project, without cutting Ram Sethu.
The bench granted six weeks time to the government to furnish a copy of the Pachauri report on the feasibility of the execution of the project through Dhanuskodi instead of routing it through Ram Sethu.
The project was flagged off in 2005 but later met opposition following a decision to dredge 'Ram Sethu', believed to have been constructed by Lord Ram to cross to Sri Lanka. A number of petitions, some of them transferred from Madras High Court to the apex court, have objected to the project on the ground of environmental concerns.
DMK President M Karunanidhi on Monday 2-4-12 slammed archrival AIADMK supremo and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa for demanding national monument status for Ram Sethu, saying that her party had for long pitched for its implementation for the state's development.
Janata Party President Subramanian Swamy had moved the Supreme Court against the demolition of Rama Sethu, while Jayalalithaa had written to Prime Minister Singh last week, insisting that the Centre declare it a national monument considering its "archaeological, cultural and historical importance."
Hindu belief is that the bridge was created by Shri Rama and Shri Lakshman with the assistance of Lord Hanuman and the 'monkey army' to reach Lanka in order to find Shri Rama's wife Sita who was kidnapped by Ravana.
Karunanidhis says the war between Rama and Ravana was between Aryan and Dravidan. Whether he can accept, that Dravidan can abduct others wife. Moreover Karunanidhi has written a will in donating his Gopalapuram House to a Hospital on the fear it may be demolished for constructing flat or for other activities. When he is having a belief that his house to be stand as his monument, why Hindus should not have belief on Ram sethu Bridge?
Ramar Sethu Bridge is a monumental for the millions of Hindus. Since Lord Rama was considered to be the father and saviour of all people in the world, Sethu Samudram channel project can be taken in other ways without hindrance to the present Ramar sethu bridge.. Please hear Tamil speech thro video.
இராம, இராவண யுத்தம் ஆரிய, திராவிடப் போர் என்றால், திராவிடன் மற்றவன் மனைவியைக் கடத்தலாமா?
The Supreme Court asked the Centre to make its stand clear on the issue of whether Ram Sethu can be declared a national monument. It also directed the government to place on record within six weeks RK Pachauri committee's report on the feasibility of an alternative alignment for the 2,427-crore Sethusamudram project, without cutting Ram Sethu.
The bench granted six weeks time to the government to furnish a copy of the Pachauri report on the feasibility of the execution of the project through Dhanuskodi instead of routing it through Ram Sethu.
The project was flagged off in 2005 but later met opposition following a decision to dredge 'Ram Sethu', believed to have been constructed by Lord Ram to cross to Sri Lanka. A number of petitions, some of them transferred from Madras High Court to the apex court, have objected to the project on the ground of environmental concerns.
DMK President M Karunanidhi on Monday 2-4-12 slammed archrival AIADMK supremo and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa for demanding national monument status for Ram Sethu, saying that her party had for long pitched for its implementation for the state's development.
Janata Party President Subramanian Swamy had moved the Supreme Court against the demolition of Rama Sethu, while Jayalalithaa had written to Prime Minister Singh last week, insisting that the Centre declare it a national monument considering its "archaeological, cultural and historical importance."
Hindu belief is that the bridge was created by Shri Rama and Shri Lakshman with the assistance of Lord Hanuman and the 'monkey army' to reach Lanka in order to find Shri Rama's wife Sita who was kidnapped by Ravana.
Karunanidhis says the war between Rama and Ravana was between Aryan and Dravidan. Whether he can accept, that Dravidan can abduct others wife. Moreover Karunanidhi has written a will in donating his Gopalapuram House to a Hospital on the fear it may be demolished for constructing flat or for other activities. When he is having a belief that his house to be stand as his monument, why Hindus should not have belief on Ram sethu Bridge?
Ramar Sethu Bridge is a monumental for the millions of Hindus. Since Lord Rama was considered to be the father and saviour of all people in the world, Sethu Samudram channel project can be taken in other ways without hindrance to the present Ramar sethu bridge.. Please hear Tamil speech thro video.
No comments:
Post a Comment